The 8 year-long federal lawsuit seeking to ban voting systems in the State of Georgia that store a voter’s intent on a QR code rather than human-verifiable text has ended today. Judge Amy Totenberg has issued her ruling, over a year after the trial concluded, determining that “the Court lacks jurisdiction to consider the merits of Plaintiffs’ claims.”
The Gateway Pundit covered this trial from Day 1 in court, witnessing several egregious manipulations of the voting system demonstrated live and on the record in the courtroom.
University of Michigan computer science professor Dr. J. Alex Halderman successfully hacked the Dominion ICX system in court using a BIC pen in one hack and tools you can purchase on Amazon for several other hacks.
The hacks resulted in the ballots printing human-readable text that were inconsistent with the voter’s intent. In other words, if you voted for Candidate A, the hack would cause the ballot to print from the ballot marking device showing a vote for Candidate B. The QR code would also record the vote as a vote for Candidate B.
However, most shockingly, Dr. Halderman was able to completely render the voter’s own confirmation of their choice. The human-readable text could be manipulated to show a vote, correctly, for Candidate A. But when the ballot is tabulated, the QR code shows a vote for Candidate B.
The link below contains links inside the article to the preceding articles on the “Halderman Hack”:
Part 3: Full Scope of Dominion ICX Hack in Federal Court is FAR Worse than Just the BIC Pen Hack
The Gateway Pundit will follow-up after the 33-page decision from Judge Totenberg is thoroughly reviewed.
One thing is certainly clear though: how on earth did this case progress for eight years, a 17-day trial, and a 14-month long lull from Judge Totenberg in rendering a decision?
BREAKING:
After an 8 year-long battle in Federal courts, spanning the two separate voting systems (Diebold and Dominion), Federal Judge Amy Totenberg has DISMISSED the Curling v Raffensperger case for “lacking jurisdiction”.
It took this judge EIGHT YEARS to determine her Court… pic.twitter.com/7Up0QzKn9y
— CannCon (@CannConActual) April 1, 2025
The Curling v. Raffensperger case has been DISMISSED after 8 long years! Judge took 14 months to write an order dismissing it on standing—a threshold issue. Unreal.https://t.co/AE0g4T9gSu pic.twitter.com/SjCXy9oMmG
— Holly Kesler (@hmkesler) April 1, 2025
The post BREAKING: 8 Year-Long Curling v. Raffensperger Federal Lawsuit on Electronic Voting Machines DISMISSED on Standing appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.