On Friday, April 18, the voice of Generation Z, War Room’s White House Correspondent and Executive Editor, Natalie Winters, thoroughly impaled David Brooks’s latest argument in the New York Times, calling for “a comprehensive national civic uprising” against President Trump.
While introducing his co-host, Natalie Winters, War Room founder Steve Bannon said, “David Brooks is a broken man. He is calling for a national mass mobilization of law firms, university professors, and the credentialed class, because, he says, Trump is in a comprehensive power move to destroy it all – every institution that he holds dear.”
Natalie Winters responded, “The Trump Derangement Syndrome truly has metastasized. I think this piece affirms what we have been discussing here, in the War Room: the Stage 4 [level] meltdown; the color revolution theory; the importance of civil uprising; and protests; in some cases, very violent.
“Pay attention to the words that they use, because it used to be mass demonstrations; it used to be non-violent protests; it used to be peaceful protests. Now, they are calling for a civil uprising,” Winters said.
Watch Winters cut a buzz saw through the New York Times’ argument for civil uprising here.
In dissecting the haughty argument put forward by Brooks, Winters identified the key players and institutions central to coordinating the revamped, global effort to undermine President Trump.
“If you look at the key researcher that [Brooks] cites throughout this piece, making the argument as to why they need to engage in this national, civic uprising, they are citing [radical Harvard professor] Erica Chenoweth.
“Two weeks ago, the story that we broke gained tens and millions of views across platforms, about how Harvard, in conjunction with USAID and the State Department, were working to fund these new resistance labs, in concordance with Democratic members of Congress, who I guess are backchanneling with Democratic AGs.
“So, it’s the same people who, for the last four years, have been intricately involved in the lawfare against President Trump. They have been on the receiving end of what I would call the Global Empire, or, at least the construct of it, in the minds of people like David Brooks,” Winters said.
Winters analyzed the stark contradiction between the real America and the narrow version of America that Brooks and the Globalists seek to promote.
“When I was reading this article, talking about the sort of divide between what Trumpism seeks to tear down – the established world order; the neoliberal and neocon rules-based order which [Globalists] want to defend – the fact that War Room is ascendant in viewership, while the New York Times and Washington Post are failing, shows you whose lived experience, whose lived reality, is actually more true and more prevalent.
“And I see very similar parallels to how these legacy media outlets covered the rise of China. It was Joe Biden who wrote a very notorious op-ed in 2008, saying that the rise of China is great for the United States; it’s great for the American people.
“But what it really comes down to; and you see this recurring theme in the David Brooks piece: their construct of the ‘American people’ is [in fact] a very small beltway elite – the group on the receiving end, not just of the USAID contracts, but of this Globalist ruling class,” Winters said.
Winters proceeded to compare these two versions of America from within the media perspective.
“You can link it to what is going on in the White House, with this New Media initiative, and the absolute rejection of the establishment, credentialed, institutional class, that sits in there; that is really upset at my face being there, and a bunch of other outlets.
“Now that there’s no censorship – all of those guardrails have been stripped off – no one cares what they have to say, because they have always been wrong. They have just rested upon this global censorship complex; the news-guards of the world, to buttress their ideas. They are beyond and above reproach; that’s why they hide behind these foreign funded think tanks.
“But now that they actually have competition, they can’t hang,” Winters said.
Winters excoriated the old guard responsible for propagating American misinformation, all the while coordinating with paid protestors and Globalists.
“The truth is actually not that hard to share if you aren’t being paid by a bunch of Globalist, neo-Marxist corporations.
“Now that the entire censorship ecosystem, and the Globalist superstructure and power structure’s wheels are spinning off, it’s a sink-or-swim moment, and I think these people are realizing that they have been living on borrowed time for a very long time, because their ideas are extremely unpopular, and, without the censorship, no one cares what they have to say.
“So, they can try all they want to terraform and manipulate the American populace into accepting their ideas, but the difference is that people will show up and support President Trump. They don’t need to be paid protestors; they don’t need to be whipped up with USAID, State Department funded propaganda to actually believe something,” Winters said.
As Winters clearly illustrated, to stir up a civic uprising, David Brooks would have to compete with millions of real Americans, who find his Globalist-elitist ideology anemic.
The post WATCH: War Room’s Natalie Winters Impales NYT’s Call for ‘Comprehensive National Civic Uprising’ Against President Trump (Video) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.